|
|
| Line 7: |
Line 7: |
| * Evaluation of prognosis | | * Evaluation of prognosis |
| ** Information regarding the likely outcome of the disease | | ** Information regarding the likely outcome of the disease |
|
| |
| == Features of investigations ==
| |
| Any single test or investigation has a certain features which are important to know about, like sensitivity.
| |
|
| |
| === True and false positive and negative ===
| |
| When researching a certain test's characteristics and usefulness in diagnosing a certain disorder, one would perform the test on both healthy people and people with the disorder. A good test will be positive in most people with the disorder and negative in most people without the disorder. However, because no test is perfect, the test will be negative in some people with the disorder, and it will be positive in some people without the disorder.
| |
|
| |
| After performing the test on a number of subjects, each subject will be put into one category:
| |
|
| |
| * True positives (TP) - those who have the disorder and tested positive with the test
| |
| * False positives (FP) - those without the disorder but who tested positive anyway
| |
| * True negatives (TN) - those without the disorder and who tested negative
| |
| * False negatives (FN) - those with the disorder but who tested negative anyway
| |
|
| |
| The best tests have as few false positives and false negatives as possible.
| |
|
| |
| === Sensitivity ===
| |
| For a given test and illness, sensitivity refers to the proportion of sick people who are tested that produce a positive test result. In terms of the above, in a certain population, sensitivity refers to the ratio of how many people are True Positives of those who have the disorder (True Positives + False Negatives).
| |
|
| |
| A perfectly sensitive test is 100% sensitive, meaning that 100% of tested sick people will test positive, meaning that no sick people will test negative. Few tests are 100% sensitive, and in real-life, most test which are regarded as highly sensitive have sensitivities around 95%.
| |
|
| |
| An example of a highly sensitive test is measuring [[D-dimer]] in suspected [[venous thromboembolism]], which has a sensitivity of 95%.
| |
|
| |
| An example of a test which is less sensitive is [[chest radiography]] in suspected [[lung cancer]], which has a sensitivity of approximately 90%.
| |
|
| |
| The sensitivity of a test is not affected by the prevalence of the disease in the tested population.
| |
|
| |
| === Specificity ===
| |
| For a given test and illness, specificity refers to the proportion of healthy people who are tested that produce a negative test result. In terms of the above, in a certain population, specificity refers to the ratio of how many people are True Negatives of those who do not have the disorder (True Negatives + False Positives).
| |
|
| |
| A perfectly specific test is 100% specific, meaning that 100% of tested healthy people will test negative, meaning that no healthy people will test positive. Few tests are 100% specific, and in real-life, most test which are regarded as highly specific have specificities around 95%.
| |
|
| |
| An example of a highly specific test is measuring [[Anti-tissue glutaminase antibody|anti-tissue glutaminase antibodies]] in suspected [[coeliac disease]], which has a specificity of 95%.
| |
|
| |
| An example of a test with low specificity is measuring [[PSA]] in suspected [[prostate cancer]], which has a specificity of 20%.
| |
|
| |
| The specificity of a test is not affected by the prevalence of the disease in the tested population.
| |
|
| |
| Unfortunately, when designing a test, there is most commonly a tradeoff between sensitivity and specificity. One cannot design a test to be perfectly sensitive, as that would produce many false positives, as such giving a low specificity, and vice-versa.
| |
|
| |
| === Pre-test and post-test probability ===
| |
| The pre-test probability refers to the probability that a patient with a certain symptom or clinical finding has a certain condition ''before'' performing a test or investigation. For an asymptomatic person, the pre-test probability is equal to the prevalence of the disease in the general population. For a symptomatic person, the pre-test probability is equal to the prevalence in a population of people with the condition ''and'' the previously mentioned symptom. As such, if the patient has symptoms or clinical findings, they have a higher probability of having the disease than the general population, and so the pre-test probability is higher than the prevalence.
| |
|
| |
| As an example, the prevalence of [[urinary tract infection]] in the general population is 11%, meaning that, if you pick a random person in the world, there is an 11% chance that they have an UTI, regardless of whether they have symptoms. However, among all people with typical urinary tract infection symptoms, approximately 80% of them have urinary tract infection. As such, if a person has typical urinary tract infection symptoms, the pre-test probability of them having UTI is 80%.
| |
|
| |
| Likewise, the post-test probability refers to the probability that a patient with a certain symptom or clinical finding has a certain condition ''after'' performing the test or investigation. Ideally, a test should increase the post-test probability to be much higher than the pre-test probability.
| |
|
| |
| === Positive predictive value ===
| |
| For a given test and illness, the positive predictive value (PPV) of a test refers to the probability that a patient has the illness if they have tested positive. Intuitively, it can be difficult to understand the difference between specificity and PPV, and I've given up trying to understand why. However, it's only important to know that the positive predictive value of a test is perhaps more important for us than sensitivity, as it tells us more about the usefulness of a test than the test's sensitivity.
| |
|
| |
| In a certain population, positive predictive value refers to the ratio of how many people are True Positives of those who tested positive (True Positives + False Positives).
| |
|
| |
| In many cases, test with high specificity have high positive predictive value as well. I can't think of any specific examples.
| |
|
| |
| However, and this is important to know, the positive predictive value of a test depends not only on the test's characteristics but also the pre-test probability of the disorder, which in turn is equal to the prevalence of the disorder (if there are no symptoms). When the pre-test probability increases, the PPV increases as well, and vice-versa. As such, even if the test is excellent and has a high specificity and sensitivity, the test may have a low positive predictive value regardless if the prevalence is low (the disease is rare).
| |
|
| |
| === Negative predictive value ===
| |
| For a given test and illness, the negative predictive value (NPV) of a test refers to the probability that a patient does not have the illness if they have tested negative. Like positive predictive value, the negative predictive value is important as it tells us the probability that the patient does not have the disease if they test negative.
| |
|
| |
| In a certain population, negative predictive value refers to the ratio of how many people are True Negatives of those who tested negative (True Negatives + False Negatives).
| |
|
| |
| In many cases, tests with high sensitivity have high negative predictive value as well. For example, unless the pre-test probability is high, a negative D-dimer has a close to 100% negative predictive value for venous thromboembolism. As such, patients with a low or medium pre-test probability for VTE who test negative for D-dimer have VTE ruled out.
| |
|
| |
| As with PPV, the negative predictive value of a test depends not only on the test's characteristics but also the pre-test probability of the disorder. However, in contrast to PPV, NPV ''decreases'' as the prevalence increases. As such, even if the test is really accurate and has a high specificity and sensitivity, the test may have a low negative predictive value regardless if the prevalence is high (the disease is common).
| |
|
| |
|
| == Value to the patient == | | == Value to the patient == |
